How to Defeat Debt Buyers in Court

THE BEST YOU CAN EXPECT  - USUALLY - IS A LOSS

The Judges, as you must realise, are totally subservient to their Paymasters. Who are they? Why, the banks of course; so, don’t expect them to do you any favours. Do you not think that a judge has a bank account into which is ‘Rewards” are paid monthly? 

What we are participating in here is a game called: “Cracks in the paving stones” which will allow you (simply as a statistic in a probability game) to slip between the cracks of a financial recovery & punishment system and become a ‘write off’. The Judge is not compromised, the claimant simply loses [and this gets put down simply to either the para-legal being unlucky, incompetent or you just being ‘lucky on the day”] and considers issuing a ‘tax adjusted write off’ on your debt, and the system rolls on to crush its next victim. All you care about is ‘It not being you that’s crushed on that day!”

To Begin, We Need a Beginning

What is Credit? Negative money – hence destructive to society generally and fully imposed upon the citizenry to enslave them. Negative impedance requires a current or Currency to run through the metaphorical veins of society.

What is a Loan Agreement? 

Nothing more than a futures contract and hence subject to all aspects of Securities Fraud and Securities Agency.

There is only one Problem – though it seems there are many.

What is the Collection Agent or Debt Buyer Suing You on the Basis of?

Unless you recognise the Problem then you would never know it had been solved, even if it had – correct? Now, if the Answer is always to be found where the Problem lies, then we have a sure fired way of ‘understanding” if not solving the problem. So, let’s go and solve or remedy it now!  

The Zulu Principle was an investment guide strategy written by English accountant and investor Jim Slater, first published in 1992. Slater named his approach to investment research and management when he observed that after reading a short article on the Zulu people in the Reader's Digest his wife was better informed on the subject than he himself was. He went on to consider that if his wife read all the books she could find on the subject of Zulus, coupled with a visit to South Africa to meet them for herself, then in a relatively short period of time she could become one of the leading authorities on that "clearly defined and narrow area of knowledge".

Hence here we see the key stratagem to defeating the Debt Collection Agent – that is in you understanding his world as much as he does, if not better.

Foreword

Virtually everyone in the world is ignorant of the procedural routines involved when a complainant, the plaintiff, decides after recovery failure, to pursue them in the courts for supposed non-payment of a ‘so called’ debt. Credit cards debt, bank loans, car loans, non-payment of local taxes, fines, all form part of the Modern-Day Money Merry Go-Around. The theatre does have some rules but for most people they fail to see or learn them. Predominately, they are The Laws of evidence and the various Business Exemptions Rules, which differ (for example) in the USA not only from county to county, but from State to State. However, the dance may be a tango or a foxtrot, it may be the Cha Cha Cha or Line dancing or flamenco, but everyone requires some music, some rhythm and two people with legs attached to feet to perform the movements.

WHEN YOU REACH A FORK IN THE ROAD – YOU CANNOT GO STRAIGHT AHEAD – ONLY ONE PATH CAN BE TAKEN – WHICH DO YOU CHOOSE?

Why you lose in Court on Debt Cases 

Going to court and the Top 10 Reasons People Fail to Win Their Case

As an appetiser the 10 most common errors that will result in 90% failure in court are the following:

1. Speculating or guessing an answer because they have done no homework and have no idea how the Debt Recovery game is played

2. Being totally unaware of the Rules of Evidence

3. Failing to Cross Examine the attorney/para-legal and/or plaintiff’s witness as they have no idea what to ask, so they feel too intimidated to respond

4. Answering a question without ‘hearing’ the question fully or to the end

5. Answering a question without understanding the question

6. Answering a question without taking the time to think what the truthful answer to the question is – the truth works well in our case

7. Answering more than is asked – only answer the question posed

8. Trying to outsmart the collection agent, para-legal, plf representative

9. Having the wrong/incorrect court room appearance.

10. Timidity